Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by French, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Maller, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Iterative Purification and Effect Size Use With Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Detection

Brian F. French

Purdue University, frenchb{at}purdue.edu

Susan J. Maller

Purdue University

Two unresolved implementation issues with logistic regression (LR) for differential item functioning (DIF) detection include ability purification and effect size use. Purification is suggested to control inaccuracies in DIF detection as a result of DIF items in the ability estimate. Additionally, effect size use may be beneficial in controlling Type I error rates. The effectiveness of such controls, especially used in combination, requires evaluation. Detection errors were evaluated through simulation across iterative purification and no purification procedures with and without the use of an effect size criterion. Sample size, DIF magnitude and percentage, and ability differences were manipulated. Purification was beneficial under certain conditions, although overall power and Type I error rates did not substantially improve. The LR statistical test without purification performed as well as other classification criteria and may be the practical choice for many situations. Continued evaluation of the effect size guidelines and purification are discussed.

Key Words: differential item functioning • logistic regression analysis • effect size • purification

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 67, No. 3, 373-393 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164406294781
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
W.-C. Wang, C.-L. Shih, and C.-C. Yang
The MIMIC Method With Scale Purification for Detecting Differential Item Functioning
Educational and Psychological Measurement, October 1, 2009; 69(5): 713 - 731.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
C.-L. Shih and W.-C. Wang
Differential Item Functioning Detection Using the Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes Method with a Pure Short Anchor
Applied Psychological Measurement, May 1, 2009; 33(3): 184 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]