Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0013164408322026v1
69/2/181    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On the Use of Nonparametric Item Characteristic Curve Estimation Techniques for Checking Parametric Model Fit

Young-Sun Lee

Teachers College, Columbia University, yslee{at}tc.columbia.edu

James A. Wollack

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Jeffrey Douglas

University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign

The purpose of this study was to assess the model fit of a 2PL through comparison with the nonparametric item characteristic curve (ICC) estimation procedures. Results indicate that three nonparametric procedures implemented produced ICCs that are similar to that of the 2PL for items simulated to fit the 2PL. However for misfitting items, especially nonmonotone items, the greatest difference is between the 2PL and kernel smoothing procedures. In general, the differences between ICCs from the nonparametric procedures and the 2PL are reduced as both sample size and test length increase. The false positive rate of the test for model fit is promising for nonparametric ICC estimation methods. Power to detect misfitting items simulated with 4PL is low. Power to detect nonmonotone items is generally much higher. Power is best for kernel smoothing but also good for isotonic regression in the medium to large sample sizes and longer test length conditions. Power for the smoothed isotonic regression is uniformly low.

Key Words: nonparametric item response theory • model fit • kernel smoothing • isotonic regression • item characteristic curve estimation

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 69, No. 2, 181-197 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164408322026


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?