Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational and Psychological Measurement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0013164409332214v1
69/5/794    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Motivation and Engagement Across the Academic Life Span

A Developmental Construct Validity Study of Elementary School, High School, and University/College Students

Andrew J. Martin

University of Sydney, a.martin{at}edfac.usyd.edu.au

From a developmental construct validity perspective, this study examines motivation and engagement across elementary school, high school, and university/college, with particular focus on the Motivation and Engagement Scale (comprising adaptive, impeding/maladaptive, and maladaptive factors). Findings demonstrated developmental construct validity across the three distinct educational stages in terms of goodfitting first- and higher order factors, invariance of factor structure across gender and age, and a pattern of correlations with cognate constructs (e.g., homework completion, academic buoyancy, class participation) consistent with predictions. Notwithstanding the predominantly parallel findings, there was also notable distinctiveness, primarily in terms of mean-level effects, such that elementary school students were generally more motivated and engaged than university/college students who in turn were more motivated and engaged than high school students. Implications for motivation and engagement measurement and theory, research in the psychoeducational domain, and the subsequent potential for performance profiling across the academic life span are discussed.

Key Words: construct validity • developmental • measurement • motivation • engagement • students

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 69, No. 5, 794-824 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0013164409332214
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?