This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0013164407312602v1 68/5/717    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Penfield, R. D. Articles by Wolfe, E. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Methods for Assessing Item, Step, and Threshold Invariance in Polytomous Items Following the Partial Credit Model

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: penfield{at}miami.edu.

	Abstract

Measurement invariance in the partial credit model (PCM) can be conceptualized in several different but compatible ways. In this article the authors distinguish between three forms of measurement invariance in the PCM: step invariance, item invariance, and threshold invariance. Approaches for modeling these three forms of invariance are proposed, and the mathematical relationship between the three forms is established. Parametric and contingency table approaches for assessing the three forms of invariance are presented, and the application of the parametric and contingency table approaches to a real data set is described. The invariance effect estimates observed for the parametric and contingency table approaches are consistent with the theoretical equivalence of the two approaches.

First published on February 5, 2008, doi:10.1177/0013164407312602

Educational and Psychological Measurement 2008;68:717.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?